terican

Last verified · v1.0

Calculator · health

Braden Scale For Predicting Pressure Sore Risk Calculator

Calculate Braden Score by rating 6 clinical subscales to determine pressure injury risk level, from no risk (19–23) to very high risk (6–9).

FreeInstantNo signupOpen source

Inputs

Braden Score (Total)

Explain my result

0/3 free

Get a plain-English breakdown of your result with practical next steps.

Braden Score (Total)points

The formula

How the
result is
computed.

What Is the Braden Scale?

The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk is a clinically validated nursing assessment tool developed in 1987 by Barbara Braden, PhD, RN, and Nancy Bergstrom, PhD, RN. Healthcare providers worldwide use this instrument to quantify a patient's risk of developing pressure injuries (also called pressure ulcers or bedsores). The tool assigns numerical subscores across six key risk domains, which are summed to produce a total Braden Score ranging from 6 to 23. Lower scores indicate greater risk of skin breakdown.

The Scoring Formula

The Braden Score equals the sum of all six subscale ratings:

Braden Score = Sensory Perception + Moisture + Activity + Mobility + Nutrition + Friction and Shear

According to the official Braden Scale reference published by the Indiana State Department of Health, each subscale reflects a distinct physiological and functional risk factor. Five subscales are rated on a 1–4 scale, while Friction and Shear is rated on a 1–3 scale, yielding a theoretical minimum of 6 and maximum of 23.

Subscale Definitions and Scoring

  • Sensory Perception (1–4): Rates the patient's capacity to feel and respond meaningfully to pressure-related discomfort. A score of 1 denotes complete sensory loss or the inability to communicate pain; 4 denotes no sensory impairment and full ability to respond to verbal commands.
  • Moisture (1–4): Measures how frequently skin is exposed to moisture from perspiration, urine, wound drainage, or other sources. A score of 1 means skin remains constantly moist, requiring linen changes every shift; 4 means skin is rarely moist, requiring linen changes only on routine schedule.
  • Activity (1–4): Reflects the patient's physical activity level. A score of 1 means the patient is completely bedfast; 4 means the patient walks outside the room at least twice per day and inside the room at least every two hours during waking hours.
  • Mobility (1–4): Assesses the ability to change and control body position. A score of 1 indicates complete immobility with no body or extremity movement; 4 indicates no limitations in making frequent large position changes independently.
  • Nutrition (1–4): Documents the patient's usual food intake pattern. A score of 1 represents very poor intake — the patient never eats a complete meal and rarely eats more than one-third of any offered food; 4 represents excellent intake — the patient eats most of every meal and never refuses a meal.
  • Friction and Shear (1–3): Evaluates the risk of skin damage from friction and shear forces during repositioning or movement. This is the only subscale with three rather than four levels. A score of 1 indicates a problem — the patient requires moderate to maximum assistance during movement and frequently slides; 3 indicates no apparent problem — the patient moves in bed and chair independently and has sufficient muscle strength to lift up completely during movement.

Score Interpretation

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Pressure Injury Prevention Workshop and Braden Scale developers define the following clinical risk thresholds:

  • 19–23: No current risk — standard preventive skin care applies
  • 15–18: Mild risk — increase repositioning frequency, assess nutrition and moisture control
  • 13–14: Moderate risk — implement structured repositioning protocol and pressure-redistributing overlays
  • 10–12: High risk — specialty support surfaces, heel offloading devices, and formal nutrition consult required
  • 6–9: Very high risk — maximum prevention protocol, alternating-air mattress systems, and multidisciplinary team coordination indicated

Step-by-Step Clinical Example

Consider an 82-year-old patient admitted after hip fracture repair. Clinicians document: Sensory Perception = 2 (very limited, responds only to painful stimuli), Moisture = 2 (very moist, linen changed every shift), Activity = 1 (bedfast), Mobility = 2 (very limited, makes slight position changes occasionally), Nutrition = 2 (probably inadequate, rarely eats a full meal and receives only occasional supplements), Friction and Shear = 1 (problem, requires maximum assistance with significant sliding). The calculated Braden Score = 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 1 = 10, placing this patient in the high-risk category. This score mandates immediate placement on a pressure-redistributing mattress, a two-hour repositioning schedule, heel offloading boots, and a dietitian referral.

Validity and Ongoing Research

Multiple peer-reviewed studies report Braden Scale sensitivity of approximately 57–83% and specificity of 60–77% across acute care, long-term care, and home health populations, establishing it as the most rigorously tested pressure injury risk tool in clinical use. Comparative research continues; for example, the CALCULATE Pressure Injury Risk Tool validation trial benchmarks emerging instruments directly against the Braden Scale as the established reference standard, underscoring its ongoing role as the gold standard in clinical practice.

Reference

Frequently asked questions

What is a good Braden score, and what score indicates high risk?
A Braden score of 19 to 23 indicates no current pressure injury risk, and standard preventive skin care is sufficient. Scores of 15 to 18 represent mild risk, 13 to 14 moderate risk, and 10 to 12 high risk requiring specialty mattresses and heel offloading. A score of 9 or below places a patient in the very high-risk category, mandating maximum preventive intervention including alternating-air support surfaces, enhanced repositioning schedules every two hours, and formal nutritional assessment by a registered dietitian.
How is the Braden Score calculated step by step?
The Braden Score is the arithmetic sum of six subscale ratings: Sensory Perception (scored 1–4), Moisture (1–4), Activity (1–4), Mobility (1–4), Nutrition (1–4), and Friction and Shear (1–3). Each subscale is rated through direct patient observation and interview. The minimum achievable score is 6, indicating the highest possible risk, and the maximum is 23, indicating minimal risk. Lower total scores always indicate greater pressure injury risk and require escalating levels of preventive clinical intervention.
How often should the Braden Scale be reassessed in hospitalized patients?
Clinical guidelines from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommend completing a Braden Scale assessment on hospital admission and repeating it every 24 to 48 hours for all high-risk patients. Patients scoring 9 or below should be reassessed at least once daily. Any acute change in clinical status — including new surgical procedures, high fever, significant decrease in oral food and fluid intake, or hemodynamic instability — should trigger an immediate unscheduled reassessment regardless of the standard scheduled interval.
What interventions are recommended when a patient has a low Braden Score?
Interventions scale with risk level. Patients scoring 15 to 18 (mild risk) benefit from repositioning every two hours, moisture barrier creams, and dietary review. Scores of 13 to 14 add pressure-redistributing foam overlays and formal nutrition consults. High-risk patients scoring 10 to 12 should receive specialty pressure-redistribution mattresses, heel offloading devices, and skin inspection at every repositioning. Very high-risk patients (9 or below) require a comprehensive skin care bundle, alternating-air mattress systems, and coordination among nursing, wound care, dietary, and rehabilitation teams.
Who developed the Braden Scale and when was it created?
The Braden Scale was developed in 1987 by Barbara Braden, PhD, RN, and Nancy Bergstrom, PhD, RN, during their research at Creighton University. The tool was designed as a practical, objective bedside instrument enabling nurses to consistently quantify pressure injury risk without requiring specialized wound care expertise. Since its initial publication, the Braden Scale has become the most widely used pressure ulcer risk assessment tool in the United States and has been adopted in clinical settings across more than 20 countries worldwide.
What is the difference between the Braden Scale and the Norton Scale for pressure ulcer risk?
The Norton Scale uses five subscales — Physical Condition, Mental Condition, Activity, Mobility, and Continence — with total scores ranging from 5 to 20, where lower scores indicate higher risk. The Braden Scale uses six subscales, adding Sensory Perception and replacing the Continence subscale with separate Moisture and Friction and Shear domains, producing scores from 6 to 23. Research comparing the two tools generally demonstrates that the Braden Scale achieves superior predictive validity in acute inpatient care settings due to its more granular risk stratification across physiologically distinct domains.