terican

Last verified · v1.0

Calculator · health

Child Pugh Score Calculator

Calculate Child-Pugh score for liver cirrhosis severity. Input bilirubin, albumin, INR, ascites, and encephalopathy grade to get Class A, B, or C.

FreeInstantNo signupOpen source

Inputs

Child-Pugh Score (5-6 = Class A, 7-9 = Class B, 10-15 = Class C)

Explain my result

0/3 free

Get a plain-English breakdown of your result with practical next steps.

Child-Pugh Score (5-6 = Class A, 7-9 = Class B, 10-15 = Class C)points

The formula

How the
result is
computed.

Child-Pugh Score: Formula, Variables, and Clinical Application

The Child-Pugh score (also called the Child-Pugh-Turcotte score) is a validated clinical scoring system used to assess the severity of liver cirrhosis, estimate short-term prognosis, and stratify surgical risk. Originally developed by Child and Turcotte in 1964 and later refined by Pugh RN et al. in their landmark 1973 British Journal of Surgery publication, the score remains a cornerstone tool in hepatology practice worldwide.

The Scoring Formula

The Child-Pugh score sums five independently scored clinical and laboratory parameters:

Total Score = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4 + P5

Each parameter receives a value of 1 (normal or mild abnormality), 2 (moderate abnormality), or 3 (severe abnormality), producing a total score ranging from 5 to 15. Higher scores indicate more advanced hepatic decompensation.

Scoring Each Variable

  • Total Bilirubin (mg/dL): Less than 2.0 mg/dL scores 1 point; 2.0-3.0 mg/dL scores 2 points; greater than 3.0 mg/dL scores 3 points. Elevated bilirubin reflects impaired hepatic conjugation and excretion capacity.
  • Serum Albumin (g/dL): Greater than 3.5 g/dL scores 1 point; 2.8-3.5 g/dL scores 2 points; less than 2.8 g/dL scores 3 points. Because albumin is synthesized exclusively in the liver, hypoalbuminemia serves as a sensitive marker of diminished hepatic synthetic function.
  • INR (International Normalized Ratio): Less than 1.7 scores 1 point; 1.7-2.3 scores 2 points; greater than 2.3 scores 3 points. Prolonged prothrombin time reflects reduced synthesis of clotting factors I, II, V, VII, and X — all produced by hepatocytes.
  • Ascites: Absent scores 1 point; mild ascites (controlled with diuretics) scores 2 points; moderate to severe or refractory ascites scores 3 points. Ascites signals portal hypertension and impaired oncotic pressure from low albumin.
  • Hepatic Encephalopathy (West Haven Criteria): No encephalopathy scores 1 point; Grade I-II (mild confusion, asterixis) scores 2 points; Grade III-IV (marked confusion, stupor, or coma) scores 3 points. Encephalopathy indicates failure to clear ammonia and other neurotoxic metabolites.

Child-Pugh Classification and Survival Estimates

  • Class A — 5 to 6 points: Well-compensated disease. Estimated 1-year survival approximately 100%; 2-year survival approximately 85%. Patients typically tolerate major surgery and standard drug dosing.
  • Class B — 7 to 9 points: Significant functional compromise. Estimated 1-year survival approximately 80%; 2-year survival approximately 60%. Elective surgery carries moderate risk; drug dose reductions are often warranted.
  • Class C — 10 to 15 points: Decompensated disease. Estimated 1-year survival approximately 45%; 2-year survival approximately 35%. Surgery is typically contraindicated except in life-threatening emergencies; liver transplant evaluation is strongly indicated.

Worked Clinical Example

A patient presents with: total bilirubin 2.5 mg/dL (2 points), serum albumin 3.0 g/dL (2 points), INR 1.9 (2 points), mild ascites controlled with spironolactone (2 points), and no hepatic encephalopathy (1 point). Total score = 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 = 9 points — Child-Pugh Class B. This patient carries moderate perioperative risk and warrants dose adjustments for hepatically metabolized medications.

Clinical Applications

  • Surgical risk stratification: Anesthesiologists and surgeons use Child-Pugh class to estimate operative mortality before abdominal, cardiac, and orthopedic procedures in cirrhotic patients.
  • Pharmaceutical dosing: FDA and EMA labeling for many drugs — including antifungals, antivirals, and targeted cancer therapies — specifies dose reductions or contraindications based on Child-Pugh Class B or C status.
  • Liver transplant prioritization: Class C patients receive priority consideration for transplant listing, used alongside the MELD score per AASLD Practice Guidelines on Cirrhosis.
  • Disease monitoring: Serial Child-Pugh scores track progression in hepatitis B, hepatitis C, alcoholic cirrhosis, and metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).

Limitations

The ascites and encephalopathy parameters involve subjective clinical judgment, introducing inter-observer variability. The score excludes renal function — a critical determinant in hepatorenal syndrome. Its ordinal scale limits precision compared to continuous models. According to StatPearls on NCBI Bookshelf, the MELD score has largely supplanted Child-Pugh for organ allocation in the United States, yet Child-Pugh retains indispensable value in surgical planning and pharmacokinetic dose-adjustment protocols globally.

Reference

Frequently asked questions

What is the Child-Pugh score and what does it measure?
The Child-Pugh score is a validated clinical tool that quantifies the severity of liver cirrhosis by evaluating five parameters: total bilirubin, serum albumin, INR, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy. Each parameter is scored 1 to 3 based on severity, producing a total between 5 and 15. The result classifies patients into Class A (well-compensated), Class B (moderate impairment), or Class C (decompensated disease), each linked to distinct survival probabilities and surgical risk profiles.
How is the Child-Pugh score calculated step by step?
Assign points to each of five variables: total bilirubin (less than 2 mg/dL = 1, 2-3 mg/dL = 2, greater than 3 mg/dL = 3); serum albumin (greater than 3.5 g/dL = 1, 2.8-3.5 g/dL = 2, less than 2.8 g/dL = 3); INR (less than 1.7 = 1, 1.7-2.3 = 2, greater than 2.3 = 3); ascites (absent = 1, mild = 2, moderate-severe = 3); and hepatic encephalopathy by West Haven grade (none = 1, Grade I-II = 2, Grade III-IV = 3). Sum all five values to obtain the final Child-Pugh score.
What do Child-Pugh Class A, B, and C mean for patient prognosis?
Child-Pugh Class A (5-6 points) represents well-compensated cirrhosis with approximately 100% 1-year survival and 85% 2-year survival, and patients generally tolerate major surgery. Class B (7-9 points) signals significant functional compromise with roughly 80% 1-year and 60% 2-year survival; elective surgery carries moderate risk. Class C (10-15 points) reflects decompensated cirrhosis with approximately 45% 1-year and 35% 2-year survival, where surgery is typically contraindicated and liver transplant evaluation is strongly recommended.
What are the main limitations of the Child-Pugh calculator?
The Child-Pugh score has several recognized limitations. The ascites and encephalopathy assessments are subjective, introducing meaningful inter-observer variability between clinicians. Renal function — a critical prognostic variable in advanced cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome — is not included. The ordinal scoring scale limits precision compared to continuous models. For these reasons, the MELD score has replaced Child-Pugh for liver transplant organ allocation in the United States, though Child-Pugh retains clinical value for surgical risk assessment and pharmaceutical dosing guidance.
How does the Child-Pugh score differ from the MELD score?
The Child-Pugh score uses five parameters on a 1-3 ordinal scale (range 5-15), including two subjective clinical variables: ascites and hepatic encephalopathy. The MELD (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease) score uses a continuous logarithmic formula based on serum bilirubin, INR, and creatinine — making it entirely objective and more precisely predictive of 90-day mortality. AASLD Practice Guidelines recommend MELD for transplant organ allocation in the United States, while Child-Pugh remains the standard reference for perioperative risk assessment and hepatic-impairment drug dosing classifications.
How is the Child-Pugh score used to guide drug dosing in liver disease?
Regulatory agencies including the FDA and EMA require pharmaceutical manufacturers to characterize drug pharmacokinetics across levels of hepatic impairment, with results reported using Child-Pugh classification. Prescribers then apply Child-Pugh Class A, B, or C labels to implement manufacturer-recommended dose reductions or contraindications. For example, many antifungal agents, protease inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and certain chemotherapy drugs specify dose caps or avoidance specifically for Class B or Class C patients, directly reducing the risk of drug accumulation and serious adverse events in cirrhotic populations.