terican

Last verified · v1.0

Calculator · health

Covid 19 Mask Effectiveness & Airborne Transmission Risk Calculator

Estimate indoor COVID-19 infection probability by mask type, room ventilation, and activity level using the Wells-Riley airborne transmission model.

FreeInstantNo signupOpen source

Inputs

Probability of Infection

—

Explain my result

0/3 free

Get a plain-English breakdown of your result with practical next steps.

Probability of Infection—

The formula

How the
result is
computed.

How the COVID-19 Airborne Transmission Risk Calculator Works

This coronavirus mask calculator applies the Wells-Riley airborne transmission model, adapted for SARS-CoV-2, to estimate the probability of infection during shared indoor exposure. Researchers extended the original Wells-Riley framework to account for mask filtration on both the exhalation and inhalation sides. A peer-reviewed mathematical framework published in PMC (2020) validated this approach for quantifying COVID-19 transmission risk under real-world indoor conditions, and it underpins tools such as the Harvard Healthy Buildings COVID-19 Transmission Calculator.

The Core Formula

The infection probability P is calculated as:

P = 1 - exp( -[ I x q x (1 - E_out) x p x (1 - E_in) x t ] / [ V x ACH ] )

This exponential dose-response equation means that incremental reductions in any single exposure parameter produce disproportionately large drops in overall infection probability, making multi-layered interventions highly effective.

Variable Definitions

  • I — Infected People in Room: The number of assumed contagious individuals present. Each additional infected person linearly multiplies the quanta concentration in the shared air volume.
  • q — Quanta Emission Rate (quanta/hour): The rate at which one infected person releases infectious particles into room air. Quiet breathing emits approximately 2 quanta/hour; normal conversation roughly 10-20 quanta/hour; loud vocalization or singing can reach 50-100 quanta/hour under Wells-Riley parameterization.
  • E_out — Exhalation Filtration Efficiency: The fraction of infectious particles blocked at the source by the infected person's mask. A surgical mask achieves approximately 55-65% source-control efficiency; a properly worn N95 respirator achieves 95%.
  • p — Breathing Rate (m3/hour): The air volume inhaled per hour by the susceptible person. At rest this is approximately 0.3 m3/hour; during light activity, 0.54 m3/hour; during heavy exercise, up to 3.0 m3/hour.
  • E_in — Inhalation Filtration Efficiency: The fraction of infectious particles filtered during inhalation by the susceptible person's mask. Cloth masks filter roughly 20-40%; KN95 masks 80-90%; properly fitted N95 respirators 95% or more.
  • t — Duration (hours): Total exposure time in the shared indoor space. Even a 15-minute exposure (0.25 hours) at high quanta emission rates can deliver a meaningful infectious dose in a poorly ventilated room.
  • V — Room Volume (m3): The total interior air volume. A standard room measuring 4 m x 3 m with a 2.5 m ceiling equals 30 m3. Larger volumes dilute airborne quanta faster, reducing steady-state concentration.
  • ACH — Air Changes per Hour: The ventilation rate. A typical home registers 0.5-1 ACH; classrooms target 3-6 ACH; hospital isolation rooms require 6-12 ACH. A standalone HEPA air purifier can add 3-6 equivalent clean-air changes per hour.

How Mask Efficiency Multiplies

Source-control and inhalation efficiency act as independent, multiplicative filters in the formula. If both the infected and susceptible persons wear N95 respirators (E_out = 0.95, E_in = 0.95), the combined infectious dose fraction is (1 - 0.95) x (1 - 0.95) = 0.0025 — a 400-fold reduction compared to unmasked exposure. This multiplicative effect explains why bilateral N95 masking is dramatically more protective than single-sided masking alone.

Worked Example

Consider one infected person speaking normally (q = 10 quanta/hour) in a 50 m3 living room with ACH = 0.5. The susceptible person breathes at 0.54 m3/hour with no masks on either side. After 2 hours: dose = (1 x 10 x 1 x 0.54 x 1 x 2) / (50 x 0.5) = 0.432 quanta, giving P = 1 - e^(-0.432) which is approximately 35% infection risk. Upgrading both parties to surgical masks (E_out = 0.60, E_in = 0.50) drops the dose to 0.0864 quanta and risk to approximately 8% — a 4-fold improvement from masks alone, before considering ventilation upgrades.

Ventilation as a Primary Control

Raising ACH from 0.5 to 6 in the same example cuts unmasked infection risk from 35% to approximately 4% with no other changes — a 9-fold improvement. Combining high ACH with bilateral N95 respirators can reduce that same 2-hour exposure risk below 0.5%. Opening windows, running HVAC systems, and adding HEPA purifiers all contribute additive equivalent ACH and should be layered alongside masking for maximum protection.

Model Limitations

This calculator assumes well-mixed room air and steady-state quanta concentration. It does not model short-range aerosol jets from coughing, near-field droplet transmission within 1 metre, or imperfect mask fit. FDA computational PPE performance research shows that improper N95 fit reduces effective filtration to 50-70%, underscoring the critical importance of fit-testing and seal checks in real-world use. Treat results as comparative risk estimates rather than precise predictions.

Reference

Frequently asked questions

How effective are N95 masks at preventing COVID-19 airborne transmission?
Properly fitted N95 respirators filter at least 95% of airborne particles on both inhalation and exhalation. When both the infected and susceptible persons wear N95s, the multiplicative protection factor reaches 400-fold, reducing infectious dose to just 0.25% of the unmasked baseline. Fit seal integrity is critical — improperly worn N95s can drop to 50-70% effective filtration according to FDA computational PPE modeling, so fit-testing and proper donning technique are essential for achieving rated performance.
What air changes per hour (ACH) is needed to reduce COVID-19 risk indoors?
Public health guidance recommends a minimum of 3-6 ACH in occupied indoor spaces to meaningfully reduce airborne COVID-19 risk. Hospital isolation rooms target 6-12 ACH. A typical home at 0.5 ACH is among the highest-risk environments. Adding a HEPA purifier correctly sized for the room can contribute 3-6 equivalent clean-air changes per hour, raising effective ACH into the 4-7 range without structural renovation — a practical upgrade endorsed by the Harvard Healthy Buildings research group.
How does the Wells-Riley model calculate COVID-19 infection probability?
The Wells-Riley model treats airborne infection as a Poisson process. Infected individuals emit infectious quanta into room air at a rate determined by their activity level. A susceptible person inhales a fraction of those quanta proportional to breathing rate, time in the room, room volume, and ventilation rate. The formula P = 1 - e^(-dose) converts the accumulated quantum dose into infection probability. Because the relationship is exponential, even partial dose reductions from masks or ventilation yield substantial risk reductions.
Does it matter more for the infected person or the uninfected person to wear a mask?
Source-control masking by the infected person and inhalation protection by the susceptible person are mathematically equally important — the formula multiplies both efficiency factors together. However, because infected individuals are often presymptomatic and unaware of their status, universal masking ensures that source-control is always present. A surgical mask on the infected person alone cuts quanta release by approximately 60%; N95 respirators worn by both parties reduces infectious dose by 99.75%, making bilateral masking the most protective scenario.
How long can you safely stay indoors with a COVID-19-positive person?
There is no universally safe duration — infection risk accumulates continuously throughout exposure. In a poorly ventilated 30 m3 room (ACH = 0.5) with one infected person speaking normally and no masks, even 15 minutes produces approximately 9% infection probability, and 2 hours reaches roughly 35%. Increasing ventilation to 6 ACH and adding N95 respirators for both parties can hold risk below 5% for the same 2-hour exposure, effectively extending safe interaction windows substantially.
Can a HEPA air purifier substitute for building ventilation in reducing COVID-19 risk?
HEPA purifiers contribute equivalent clean-air delivery rates that add directly to the effective ACH value in the Wells-Riley calculation. A purifier delivering 150 m3/hour of filtered air in a 50 m3 room adds 3 equivalent ACH, substantially compensating for inadequate mechanical ventilation. However, purifiers do not dilute CO2 or other gaseous contaminants the way outdoor-air ventilation does, so they are best treated as a supplement rather than a complete replacement for fresh-air building ventilation systems.