Last verified · v1.0
Calculator · health
Resting Metabolic Rate (Rmr) Calculator
Calculate your Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR) using the Mifflin-St Jeor or Katch-McArdle equation. Enter age, weight, height, and sex for instant results.
Inputs
Resting Metabolic Rate
—
Explain my result
Get a plain-English breakdown of your result with practical next steps.
The formula
How the
result is
computed.
What Is Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR)?
Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR) represents the number of calories the body burns while completely at rest to sustain essential physiological functions — breathing, circulation, temperature regulation, and cellular repair. Unlike Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR), which requires strict laboratory fasting and thermoneutral conditions, RMR is measured after only a brief rest period, making it the more practical and widely used metric in clinical nutrition and everyday fitness planning.
RMR typically accounts for 60–75% of total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), making it the single largest driver of daily calorie burn. Accurately estimating RMR provides the essential baseline for designing weight-loss plans, athletic nutrition programs, and clinical feeding protocols.
The Mifflin-St Jeor Equation
The most widely validated predictive formula for RMR is the Mifflin-St Jeor equation, developed in 1990 and endorsed by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics as the preferred method for estimating resting energy expenditure in healthy adults. According to a 2023 review published in Nutrients, this equation estimates RMR within ±10% of indirect calorimetry measurements in approximately 80% of healthy non-obese adults — the highest accuracy of any weight-based formula evaluated.
- Males: RMR = (10 × W) + (6.25 × H) − (5 × A) + 5
- Females: RMR = (10 × W) + (6.25 × H) − (5 × A) − 161
Where W = body weight in kilograms, H = height in centimeters, and A = age in years.
Variable Breakdown
- Weight (W): Body mass carries the largest coefficient (×10) because greater tissue volume demands proportionally more energy to maintain cellular homeostasis at rest.
- Height (H): Taller individuals carry larger organ volume and body surface area, elevating baseline metabolic demand. The coefficient ×6.25 applies when height is expressed in centimeters.
- Age (A): Metabolic rate declines approximately 1–2% per decade after age 20 as lean muscle mass and hormonal output decrease. The negative coefficient (×−5) captures this physiological trend.
- Sex constant: The +5 for biological males and −161 for biological females encodes average differences in lean body mass, organ size, and hormonal profiles between the two sexes.
Worked Examples
A 35-year-old male weighing 80 kg and standing 178 cm tall: RMR = (10 × 80) + (6.25 × 178) − (5 × 35) + 5 = 800 + 1,112.5 − 175 + 5 = 1,742.5 kcal/day.
A 35-year-old female weighing 65 kg and standing 163 cm tall: RMR = (10 × 65) + (6.25 × 163) − (5 × 35) − 161 = 650 + 1,018.75 − 175 − 161 = 1,332.75 kcal/day.
The Katch-McArdle Equation
For individuals who know their body fat percentage, the Katch-McArdle equation offers a body-composition-based alternative that eliminates the sex constant by using lean body mass (LBM) directly: RMR = 370 + (21.6 × LBM in kg), where LBM = total body weight × (1 − body fat fraction). A study by Nelson et al. in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise confirmed that lean-mass-based equations outperform weight-based formulas in athletic populations where fat-free mass diverges significantly from population averages.
Converting RMR to Total Daily Calorie Needs
Multiply RMR by an activity factor from the USDA Dietary Reference Intake framework to estimate TDEE: sedentary (×1.2), lightly active 1–3 days/week (×1.375), moderately active 3–5 days/week (×1.55), very active 6–7 days/week (×1.725), and extra active with physical labor plus daily training (×1.9). Using the male example above, moderate activity yields TDEE = 1,742.5 × 1.55 = 2,700.9 kcal/day. A 500 kcal/day deficit from this TDEE produces approximately 0.45 kg of weight loss per week.
Accuracy and Clinical Considerations
All predictive equations carry an inherent margin of error. Accuracy decreases in individuals with morbid obesity (BMI > 40), exceptional muscle mass, pregnancy, thyroid disorders, or those on metabolism-affecting medications. For clinical decisions — ICU feeding plans, bariatric surgery support, or oncology nutrition — indirect calorimetry using a metabolic cart remains the gold standard for measuring true resting energy expenditure.
Reference